How to write a review of a scholarly article

How to write a review of a scholarly article

 · Conclusions: The scholarly book review serves many purposes and has the potential to be an influential literary form. The process of publishing a successful scholarly book review requires the reviewer to appreciate the book review publication process and to be aware of the skills and strategies involved in writing a successful blogger.com by: 21  · Writing a literature review requires a range of skills to gather, sort, evaluate and summarise peer-reviewed published data into a relevant and informative unbiased narrative. Digital access to research papers, academic texts, review articles, reference databases and public data Articles should be from peer-reviewed or scholarly journals and relate to the field of study that the class discusses. Instructions. 1 Search the library's online databases, such as EbscoHost and others, to find scholarly or peer-reviewed articles. You can also look in indexes available at the library. 2 Author: Kubiak

How To Write An Article Review, with Sample

For many kinds of assignments, like a literature reviewyou may be asked how to write a review of a scholarly article offer a critique or review of a journal article. This is an opportunity for you as a scholar to offer your qualified opinion and evaluation of how another scholar has composed their article, argument, and research.

That means you will be expected to go beyond a simple summary of the how to write a review of a scholarly article and evaluate it on a deeper level. As a college student, this might sound intimidating.

However, as you engage with the research process, you are becoming immersed in a particular topic, and your insights about the way that topic is presented are valuable and can contribute to the overall conversation surrounding your topic. Some disciplines, like Criminal Justice, may only want you to summarize the article without including your opinion or evaluation. If your assignment is to summarize the article only, please see our literature review handout.

Before getting started on the critique, it is important to review the article thoroughly and critically. To do this, we recommend take notes, annotatingand reading the article several times before critiquing. As you read, be sure to note important items like the thesis, purpose, research questions, hypotheses, methods, evidence, key findings, major conclusions, tone, and publication information. Depending on your writing context, some of these items may not be applicable.

To evaluate a source, consider some of the following questions. They are broken down into different categories, but answering these questions will help you consider what areas to examine.

With each category, we recommend identifying the strengths and weaknesses in each since that is a critical part of evaluation.

Following, we have an example of a summary and an evaluation of a research article. Note that in most literature review contexts, the summary and evaluation would be much shorter. This extended example shows the different ways a student can critique and write about an article. Chik, how to write a review of a scholarly article, A. Reinders ed. Eastbourne, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Be sure to include the full citation either in a reference page or near your evaluation if writing an annotated bibliography.

Their data was recorded through a survey, class discussion, and a seven-day gaming trial done by six teachers who recorded their reflections through personal blog posts.

The second part explored undergraduate gaming habits of ten Hong Kong students who were regular gamers. Their habits were recorded through language learning histories, videotaped gaming sessions, blog entries of gaming practices, group discussion sessions, stimulated recall sessions on gaming videos, interviews with other gamers, and posts from online discussion forums.

The research shows that while students recognize the educational potential of games and have seen benefits of it in their how to write a review of a scholarly article, the instructors overall do not see the positive impacts of gaming on foreign language learning. Particularly for the data collection of the undergraduate gamers, there were many opportunities for an in-depth examination of their gaming practices and histories.

However, the representation of the teachers in this study was very uneven when compared to the students. Not only were teachers labeled as numbers while the students picked out their own pseudonyms, but also when viewing the data collection, the undergraduate students were more closely examined in comparison to the teachers in the study.

While the students have fifteen extended quotes describing their experiences in their research section, the teachers only have two of these instances in their section, which shows just how imbalanced the study is when presenting instructor voices.

Some research methods, like the recorded gaming sessions, were only used with students whereas teachers were only asked to blog about their gaming experiences. This creates a richer narrative for the students while also failing to give instructors the chance to have more nuanced perspectives. This lack of nuance also stems from the emphasis of the non-gamer teachers over the gamer teachers. This was an opportunity to give the teacher group a more complex story, and the opportunity was entirely missed.

Additionally, the context of this study was not entirely clear. Why these particular teachers and students were recruited was not explicitly defined and also has the potential to skew results in a particular direction. This evaluation includes a summative statement that gives the overall impression of the article at the end, but this can also be placed at the beginning of the evaluation. This evaluation mainly discusses the representation of data and methods. However, other areas, how to write a review of a scholarly article, like organization, are open to critique.

Skip to main content, how to write a review of a scholarly article. Academics Study at UIS. Getting Started. Get Involved. Arts at UIS. Alumni Resources, how to write a review of a scholarly article. Visit UIS. Blackboard Bookstore Box Calendar Canvas Self Service Enterprise iCard Library Brookens myUIS United in Safety UIS Connection PayMyBill Webmail Outlook Email.

Search Search. Breadcrumbs University of Illinois Springfield Center for Academic Success The Learning Hub Writing Handouts Research Methods How to Review a Journal Article How to Review a Journal Article. IMPORTANT NOTE!! Questions to Consider To evaluate a source, consider some of the following questions. How well does the objective of the experiment or of the observation fill a need for the field?

How well does the discussion maintain cohesion? Where could the author have benefited from expanding, condensing, or omitting ideas? Challenge ambiguous statements. What underlying assumptions does the author have, and how does this affect the credibility or clarity of their article? How objective is the author in his or her discussion of the topic? Evaluating Methods How appropriate are the study design and methods for the purposes of the study? How detailed are the methods being described?

Is the author leaving out important steps or considerations? Have the procedures been presented in enough detail to enable the reader to duplicate them? Evaluating Data Scan and spot-check calculations. Are the statistical methods appropriate? Do you find any content repeated or duplicated? How many errors of fact and interpretation does the author include? You can check on this by looking up the references the author cites. What pertinent literature has the author cited, and have they used this literature appropriately?

Example Following, we have an example of a summary and an evaluation of a research article. Citation Chik, A. The evaluation is clearly organized and uses transitional phrases when moving to a new topic.

EDLM505 Critical Review of a Journal Article

, time: 13:33

How to Write an Article Review: Full Guide with Examples | EssayPro

 · Steps for Writing an Article Review Read the article carefully, taking note of words, phrases, and concepts you need to research, define, and look up meanings for. Research the terms online or at a library. Take clear notes which can be turned into paragraphs later. Discuss the topic of the article with someone involved in that field of endeavor.3,6/5  · Conclusions: The scholarly book review serves many purposes and has the potential to be an influential literary form. The process of publishing a successful scholarly book review requires the reviewer to appreciate the book review publication process and to be aware of the skills and strategies involved in writing a successful blogger.com by: 21  · When writing an article review, you will summarize the main ideas, arguments, positions, and findings, and then critique the article's contributions to the field and overall effectiveness. Article 92%()